(Featured) The Ethics of Technology: How Can Indigenous Thought Contribute?

The Ethics of Technology: How Can Indigenous Thought Contribute?

John Weckert and Rogelio Bayod present a comprehensive examination of the intersection between ethics, technology, and Indigenous worldviews. The authors argue that the ethics of technology, which largely remains a peripheral concern in technological developments, could significantly benefit from the incorporation of Indigenous perspectives. They contend that the entrenched paradigms of Western thought, with their focus on materialism, individualism, efficiency, and progress, often marginalize ethical considerations. This, they suggest, is where Indigenous worldviews, which emphasize relationality, spirituality, and a reciprocal relationship with the Earth, could offer a potent alternative.

A key aspect of Indigenous thought highlighted in the paper is the concept of relationality. Indigenous worldviews often consider all entities, living and non-living, as interconnected and mutually influential. This view contrasts with the Western conceptualization of individual entities as distinct and primarily self-interested. Consequently, incorporating this perspective into the ethics of technology could help shift the focus from the maximization of individual benefits to the maintenance of collective well-being. The paper also underscores the Indigenous emphasis on spirituality, where both natural and man-made objects can hold spiritual or non-material significance. This perspective could help challenge the prevailing Western materialistic worldview, fostering a more holistic understanding of technological artifacts and their value.

The authors propose that integrating these Indigenous concepts could provide a foundation for a reimagined Western worldview, even if these elements are interpreted metaphorically rather than literally. Such a worldview, they argue, would not only challenge the prevailing emphasis on materialistic values but could also facilitate a more beneficial development and use of technology. This reframed paradigm would prioritize environmental health, reduce the production of disposable products, and lessen the focus on profitability, efficiency, and individualism. Instead, it would place greater emphasis on care for the Earth, kinship, relationships, and spirituality.

This research contributes to broader philosophical discussions around the ethics of technology and futures studies. It offers a critical reframing of our relationship with technology, drawing on Indigenous worldviews to challenge dominant Western paradigms. By doing so, it highlights the value of diverse perspectives in shaping our technological futures and raises critical questions around the role of values and worldviews in guiding technological development. This paper thus adds to ongoing debates around decolonizing technology and futures studies, and extends them into the sphere of ethics.

The paper suggests numerous avenues for future research. Given its emphasis on the potential of Indigenous worldviews, further explorations could delve deeper into specific Indigenous perspectives on technology, drawing from a wider range of cultures and traditions. Another promising area for future research could involve examining how these Indigenous values could be operationalized within different technological domains, and the possible impacts this could have. Finally, there is a significant need for empirical research on how this paradigm shift might be achieved, and the potential barriers and facilitators involved. This research paper thus opens the door to a rich array of investigations that could fundamentally reshape our understanding of the ethics of technology.

Abstract

The ethics of technology is not as effective as it should. Despite decades of ethical discussion, development and use of new technologies continues apace without much regard to those discussions. Economic and other forces are too powerful. More focus needs to be placed on the values that underpin social attitudes to technology. By seriously looking at Indigenous thought and comparing it with the typical Western way of seeing the world, we can gain a better understanding of our own views. The Indigenous Filipino worldview provides us with a platform for assessing our own core values and suggests modifications to those values. It also indicates ways for broadening and altering the focus of the ethics of technology to make it more effective in helping us to use technologies in ways more conducive to human well-being.

The Ethics of Technology: How Can Indigenous Thought Contribute?

(Featured) The five tests: designing and evaluating AI according to indigenous Māori principles

The five tests: designing and evaluating AI according to indigenous Māori principles

Luke Munn provides a critical analysis of the current paradigms of artificial intelligence (AI) development and offer a framework for a decolonial AI. The author argues that existing AI paradigms reproduce and reinforce coloniality and its attendant inequalities. To overcome this, he proposes a framework based on Indigenous concepts from Aotearoa (New Zealand), which offers a distinct set of principles and priorities that challenge Western technocratic norms. The framework is centered on five tests that prioritize human dignity, communal integrity, and ecological sustainability. The author suggests that the application of these tests can guide the design and development of AI products in a way that is more inclusive, thoughtful, and attentive to life in its various forms.

The author identifies two distinct pathways for applying their framework. The first pathway is designing, which involves applying the principles and priorities of the Five Tests to the development of AI products that are currently in progress. This involves asking questions about how these products can respect the sacred, preserve or enhance life force, and reconcile negative impacts in acceptable ways. The author suggests that iterative versions of software can be developed by engaging genuinely with these questions and resolving them through code, architectures, interfaces, and affordances. The second pathway is decolonizing, which involves a deeper and more sustained confrontation with current AI regimes. This pathway involves challenging generic, universalizing frames, stressing the connection and interdependence of human and ecological well-being, and carefully considering potential impacts and developing ways to mitigate them or redress them to satisfy involved parties.

The author’s framework challenges current AI paradigms and practices by raising questions about what data-driven technology should be doing, how it can be designed in ways that are more inclusive, communal, and sustainable, and what values and norms should be used to judge the success of a particular technology. He suggests that these questions are epistemological, cultural and historical, and social in nature. And he argues that understanding and undoing systems of inequality that have been formalized and fossilized over time is a massive undertaking that demands a long-term project that prioritizes social justice.

In broader philosophical terms, this paper raises questions about the relationship between technology and power, the role of knowledge systems in shaping our understanding of the world, and the importance of Indigenous perspectives in challenging dominant paradigms. The authors’ framework challenges the Western-centric assumptions that underpin current AI paradigms and highlights the importance of recognizing and respecting diverse perspectives and ways of knowing.

Future research could explore the practical implications of the Five Tests framework and how it can be applied in different contexts. It could also examine the ways in which Indigenous perspectives can challenge dominant paradigms in other fields, such as philosophy, politics, and economics. Additionally, research could explore the potential for cross-cultural collaboration in the development of AI and other technologies, and how this collaboration can facilitate the recognition and respect of diverse perspectives and knowledge systems. Finally, research could explore the broader implications of the authors’ framework for the relationship between technology and power and the potential for decolonial approaches to reshape our understanding of the role of technology in society.

Abstract

As AI technologies are increasingly deployed in work, welfare, healthcare, and other domains, there is a growing realization not only of their power but of their problems. AI has the capacity to reinforce historical injustice, to amplify labor precarity, and to cement forms of racial and gendered inequality. An alternate set of values, paradigms, and priorities are urgently needed. How might we design and evaluate AI from an indigenous perspective? This article draws upon the five Tests developed by Māori scholar Sir Hirini Moko Mead. This framework, informed by Māori knowledge and concepts, provides a method for assessing contentious issues and developing a Māori position. This paper takes up these tests, considers how each test might be applied to data-driven systems, and provides a number of concrete examples. This intervention challenges the priorities that currently underpin contemporary AI technologies but also offers a rubric for designing and evaluating AI according to an indigenous knowledge system.

The five tests: designing and evaluating AI according to indigenous Māori principles